Moore v. Brooks

2026 NCBC 53 · North Carolina Superior Court, Business Court · June 9, 2026 · No. 25CV001214-310

Summary

The North Carolina Business Court indicates that it would deny Plaintiffs’ Rule 60(b)(4) motion to set aside an order dismissing the Robinson Defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. Although the defendants initially failed to timely file their motion to dismiss with the Durham County Clerk, they filed it through the Business Court’s electronic filing system, and Plaintiffs had notice, fully litigated the motion, and suffered no material prejudice. The Court concluded that the filing violation did not render the prior order void and that the later filing with the Clerk also mooted Plaintiffs’ principal objection.

Holdings

  1. A trial court retains limited jurisdiction to hear a Rule 60(b) motion and indicate its probable disposition after a notice of appeal has been entered.
  2. A violation of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure and Business Court Rules requiring filing with the county clerk does not, by itself, deprive the Business Court of jurisdiction to consider a motion or render the resulting order void when the opposing party had notice and a full and fair opportunity to respond.
  3. The court indicated that it would deny plaintiffs' Rule 60(b)(4) motion because the prior order was not void, plaintiffs suffered no material prejudice, the filing deficiency was technical, and the motion had subsequently been filed with the county clerk.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Business Court retained limited jurisdiction to indicate its probable disposition of a Rule 60(b)(4) motion while an appeal from the challenged order was pending.
  2. Whether the Robinson Defendants' failure to timely file their motion to dismiss with the county clerk rendered the motion nonexistent and the resulting order dismissing them for lack of personal jurisdiction void.
  3. Whether the Rule 60(b)(4) motion should be denied where the filing violation was technical, plaintiffs had notice and a full opportunity to be heard, there was no material prejudice, and the motion was later filed with the county clerk.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • Hagwood v. Odom, 88 N.C. App. 513, 518 (1988)(followed)
  • Chen v. Zou, 244 N.C. App. 14, 16 (2015)(followed)
  • Allred v. Tucci, 85 N.C. App. 138, 142 (1987)(followed)
  • Towne v. Cope, 32 N.C. App. 660, 665 (1977)(followed)
  • Estate of Capps v. Blondeau, 2014 NCBC LEXIS 24, at *18-*20 (N.C. Super. Ct. June 17, 2014)(followed)
  • Overton Row Holdings, LLC v. CW Constr. & Dev., LLC, 2026 NCBC LEXIS 117, at *7-*8 (N.C. Super. Ct. June 2, 2026)(followed)
  • State v. Bellar, 16 N.C. App. 339, 343 (1972)(followed)
  • Castillo v. RRD Fin., LLC, 2025 NCBC LEXIS 114, at *9-*10 (N.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 3, 2025)(followed)
  • Slattery v. Appy City, LLC, 385 N.C. 726, 735-36 (2024)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…