State v. Williams

2026-Ohio-85 · Ohio Court of Appeals, Fifth Appellate District, Muskingum County · January 9, 2026 · No. CT2025-0062

Summary

The Ohio Fifth District Court of Appeals affirmed Marquise T. Williams’s sentence for felonious assault. The court held that the trial court was not required to follow the parties’ jointly recommended three-year sentence and that the imposed five-to-seven-and-a-half-year prison term was not contrary to law.

Holdings

  1. The sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law because it was within the statutory range and the record did not establish that the trial court failed to consider the purposes and principles of felony sentencing or the applicable seriousness and recidivism factors.
  2. The trial court was not obligated to follow the parties' joint recommendation and did not err by imposing a different sentence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court imposed a sentence contrary to the purposes and principles of felony sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 because it did not impose the minimum sanctions necessary to achieve those purposes.
  2. Whether the trial court erred by rejecting the parties' joint sentencing recommendation and considering allegations and letters associated with the presentence investigation report.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (9)

  • State v. Marcum, 2016-Ohio-1002(followed)
  • Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469, paragraph three of the syllabus(followed)
  • State v. Renne, 2025-Ohio-5809, ¶ 12 (5th Dist.)(followed)
  • State v. Morris, 2021-Ohio-2646, ¶ 90 (5th Dist.)(followed)
  • State v. Dinka, 2019-Ohio-4209, ¶ 36 (12th Dist.)(followed)
  • State v. Taylor, 2024-Ohio-238, ¶ 14 (5th Dist.)(followed)
  • State v. Davis, 2025-Ohio-3126, ¶ 50 (5th Dist.)(followed)
  • State v. Underwood, 2010-Ohio-1, ¶ 29(followed)
  • State v. Marshall, 2025-Ohio-3291, ¶ 12 (5th Dist.)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…