State v. McLaughlin

2026-Ohio-517 · Ohio Ninth District Court of Appeals · February 17, 2026 · No. 25AP0026

Summary

The Ninth District Court of Appeals of Ohio affirmed Mark Anthony McLaughlin’s sentence for felony failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer. The court held that the trial court properly considered the statutory sentencing factors and did not err by imposing a lifetime operator’s license suspension.

Holdings

  1. The lifetime operator's license suspension was authorized by statute and was not contrary to law because the record supported the trial court's consideration of the relevant statutory sentencing factors.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court erred by imposing a lifetime operator's license suspension as part of McLaughlin's sentence.
  2. Whether the record supported the trial court's consideration of the statutory seriousness, recidivism, and public-safety factors when imposing the lifetime suspension.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • State v. Marcum, 2016-Ohio-1002(followed)
  • Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469, 477 (1954)(followed)
  • State v. Foster, 2006-Ohio-856(followed)
  • State v. Lucas, 2019-Ohio-2607(followed)
  • State v. Mathis, 2006-Ohio-855(followed)
  • State v. Godschild, 2025-Ohio-5085(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Ohio Ninth District Court Of Appeals