Summary
The Second Circuit affirmed a wire fraud sentence, holding that the district court's loss calculation under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 was reasonable and properly included a promissory note as relevant conduct under § 1B1.3. Any error in calculating loss from a fraudulently obtained vehicle lease was harmless because the district court stated it would impose the same sentence regardless. The court also upheld the assignment of two criminal history points under § 4A1.1(b) for a prior "time served" sentence of 339 days, which exceeded the 60-day threshold.
Holdings
- The district court did not commit procedural error in its loss calculation; any error regarding the Chrysler lease was harmless.
- The district court properly assigned the points because the sentence of time served exceeded the sixty-day threshold.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court erred in its loss calculation for the automobile leases and promissory note.
- Whether the district court erred in assigning two criminal history points for a prior conviction for giving a false statement.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- United States v. Verkhoglyad, 516 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2008)(positive)
- United States v. Cavera, 550 F.3d 180 (2d Cir. 2008) (en banc)(positive)
- United States v. Byors, 586 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2009)(positive)
- United States v. Binday, 804 F.3d 558 (2d Cir. 2015)(positive)
- United States v. Certified Envtl. Servs., Inc., 753 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2014)(positive)
- United States v. D'Oliveira, 402 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2005)(positive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…