Summary
The Louisiana Second Circuit affirmed summary judgment dismissing Sherita Cooks's claims against the City of Shreveport and related defendants. The court held that Cooks failed to establish constructive termination, discipline, reprisal, or a threat of reprisal under Louisiana's whistleblower statutes, and that the outstanding discovery concerning an alleged secret fund was immaterial to that issue.
Holdings
- Cooks failed to establish a prima facie case of constructive termination or otherwise produce evidence that the public employer subjected her to discipline, reprisal, or a threat of discipline or reprisal. The evidence concerning an employee-assistance-program scheduling dispute, the prior employees' departures, the sabbatical, and the instruction to stop pursuing the fund matter did not show that the employer intentionally and deliberately created working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person would feel compelled to resign.
- The outstanding discovery concerning the International CAD Consortium fund did not preclude summary judgment because the details of the fund were immaterial to whether Cooks could prove constructive termination, discipline, reprisal, or a threat thereof.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment on Cooks's whistleblower claims because she failed to produce evidence of constructive termination, discipline, reprisal, or a threat thereof.
- Whether summary judgment was premature because Cooks had outstanding discovery concerning the alleged International CAD Consortium fund.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Peironnet v. Matador Res. Co., 12-2292 (La. 6/28/13), 144 So. 3d 791, 814(followed)
- Hines v. Garrett, 04-0806 (La. 6/25/04), 876 So. 2d 764(followed)
- Jones v. Est. of Santiago, 03-1424 (La. 4/14/04), 870 So. 2d 1002, 1006(followed)
- Ray v. City of Bossier City, 37,708 (La. App. 2 Cir. 10/24/03), 859 So. 2d 264(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…