Summary
The Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed Rapheal Clark’s four-year hard-labor sentence for theft of merchandise valued between $1,000 and $5,000. The court held that the trial court adequately considered the sentencing factors under La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1 and that the sentence was not constitutionally excessive.
Holdings
- The trial court adequately considered the applicable aggravating and mitigating factors even though it did not discuss every factor individually; the record showed that it considered the mitigating evidence presented by Clark and tailored the sentence to the circumstances.
- The four-year sentence was not constitutionally excessive because it was below the statutory maximum and did not constitute a grossly disproportionate punishment or otherwise shock the sense of justice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court adequately complied with La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1 by considering applicable aggravating and mitigating sentencing factors.
- Whether Clark's four-year sentence for theft of merchandise valued between $1,000 and $5,000 was constitutionally excessive under the Louisiana Constitution and the Eighth Amendment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- State v. Caldwell, 56,269 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/21/25), 411 So. 3d 934(followed)
- State v. Benavides, 54,265 (La. App. 2 Cir. 3/9/22), 336 So. 3d 114(followed)
- State v. Abercrumbia, 412 So. 2d 1027 (La. 1982)(followed)
- State v. Williams, 56,184 (La. App. 2 Cir. 2/26/25), 409 So. 3d 306(followed)
- State v. Bell, 53,712 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1/13/21), 310 So. 3d 307(followed)
- State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La. 12/13/04), 893 So. 2d 7(followed)
- State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La. 5/31/96), 674 So. 2d 957(followed)
- State v. Cozzetto, 07-2031 (La. 2/15/08), 974 So. 2d 665(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…