Summary
The Louisiana Second Circuit affirmed Anthony J. Hollis’s conviction for sexual battery and his 90-year sentence under La. R.S. 14:43.1(C)(2). The court rejected challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, expert testimony concerning the child forensic interview, the responsive verdicts and sentencing factors under Apprendi, and the denial of post-verdict acquittal. The court held that any Apprendi error was harmless and that the remaining assignments of error lacked merit.
Holdings
- The evidence was sufficient to support Hollis's sexual-battery conviction because, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational jury could find the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Hollis's challenge to the forensic interviewer's testimony was not reviewable because he made no contemporaneous objection and expressly stated that he had no objection to playing the interview for the jury.
- The trial court committed an Apprendi violation by failing to submit the age-related facts associated with the enhanced sexual-battery penalty to the jury, but the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and did not require vacatur of the sentence.
- The challenge to the denial of the post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal lacked merit because it duplicated the sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim already rejected by the court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia to support Hollis's sexual-battery conviction.
- Whether testimony by the forensic interviewer about child-abuse disclosures and interviewing procedures improperly vouched for C.C.'s credibility under State v. Foret.
- Whether the trial court violated Apprendi by failing to provide an under-thirteen responsive verdict or otherwise submit the age-related sentencing facts to the jury, and whether any error was harmless.
- Whether the trial court erred in denying Hollis's post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal under La. C. Cr. P. art. 821.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (21)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S. Ct. 2781, 61 L. Ed. 2d 560 (1979)(followed)
- State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La. 5/20/03), 851 So. 2d 921(followed)
- State v. Ward, 50,872 (La. App. 2 Cir. 11/16/16), 209 So. 3d 228(followed)
- State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La. 10/16/95), 661 So. 2d 442(followed)
- State v. Allen, 36,180 (La. App. 2 Cir. 9/18/02), 828 So. 2d 622(followed)
- State v. Felix, 56,367 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/27/25), 419 So. 3d 427(followed)
- State v. Barakat, 38,419 (La. App. 2 Cir. 6/23/04), 877 So. 2d 223(followed)
- State v. Coliston, 56,332 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/27/25), 420 So. 3d 284(followed)
- State v. Naulty, 24-0118 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2/27/25), 406 So. 3d 1231(followed)
- State v. Walker, 55,255 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/9/23), 369 So. 3d 488(followed)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…