State of Louisiana v. Anthony J. Hollis

No. 56,710-KA · Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit · January 14, 2026 · No. No. 56,710-KA

Summary

The Louisiana Second Circuit affirmed Anthony J. Hollis’s conviction for sexual battery and his 90-year sentence under La. R.S. 14:43.1(C)(2). The court rejected challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, expert testimony concerning the child forensic interview, the responsive verdicts and sentencing factors under Apprendi, and the denial of post-verdict acquittal. The court held that any Apprendi error was harmless and that the remaining assignments of error lacked merit.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient to support Hollis's sexual-battery conviction because, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational jury could find the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
  2. Hollis's challenge to the forensic interviewer's testimony was not reviewable because he made no contemporaneous objection and expressly stated that he had no objection to playing the interview for the jury.
  3. The trial court committed an Apprendi violation by failing to submit the age-related facts associated with the enhanced sexual-battery penalty to the jury, but the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and did not require vacatur of the sentence.
  4. The challenge to the denial of the post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal lacked merit because it duplicated the sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim already rejected by the court.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia to support Hollis's sexual-battery conviction.
  2. Whether testimony by the forensic interviewer about child-abuse disclosures and interviewing procedures improperly vouched for C.C.'s credibility under State v. Foret.
  3. Whether the trial court violated Apprendi by failing to provide an under-thirteen responsive verdict or otherwise submit the age-related sentencing facts to the jury, and whether any error was harmless.
  4. Whether the trial court erred in denying Hollis's post-verdict motion for judgment of acquittal under La. C. Cr. P. art. 821.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (21)

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S. Ct. 2781, 61 L. Ed. 2d 560 (1979)(followed)
  • State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La. 5/20/03), 851 So. 2d 921(followed)
  • State v. Ward, 50,872 (La. App. 2 Cir. 11/16/16), 209 So. 3d 228(followed)
  • State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La. 10/16/95), 661 So. 2d 442(followed)
  • State v. Allen, 36,180 (La. App. 2 Cir. 9/18/02), 828 So. 2d 622(followed)
  • State v. Felix, 56,367 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/27/25), 419 So. 3d 427(followed)
  • State v. Barakat, 38,419 (La. App. 2 Cir. 6/23/04), 877 So. 2d 223(followed)
  • State v. Coliston, 56,332 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/27/25), 420 So. 3d 284(followed)
  • State v. Naulty, 24-0118 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2/27/25), 406 So. 3d 1231(followed)
  • State v. Walker, 55,255 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/9/23), 369 So. 3d 488(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…