Summary
The Seventh Circuit held that a petition for leave to appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) must be filed within ten days of the original class-certification order, or a timely reconsideration disposition. A belated motion to decertify does not restart the Rule 23(f) period unless the district court materially alters the class-certification decision; the petition was therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Holdings
- A party may not use a motion to decertify or a motion for reconsideration filed more than ten days after the class-certification order to create a new ten-day window for seeking permission to appeal under Rule 23(f).
- An untimely or successive motion for reconsideration does not extend or restart the time for seeking appellate review under Rule 23(f).
- If a district judge responds to a belated reconsideration motion by materially altering the class-certification decision, the party aggrieved by that alteration may seek permission to appeal within the normal Rule 23(f) period; that exception does not apply when the motion is denied and the class definition remains unchanged.
Questions Presented
- Whether a party may obtain interlocutory review under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) by filing a petition within ten days after the denial of a motion to decertify a class when the motion was filed more than ten days after the original class-certification order.
- Whether a belated or successive motion for reconsideration or decertification restarts the ten-day period for a Rule 23(f) petition.
- Whether the exception for a materially altered decision applies when the district court denies the motion and leaves the class definition unchanged.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Blair v. Equifax Check Services, Inc., 181 F.3d 832 (7th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Browder v. Director, Department of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 98 S. Ct. 556, 54 L. Ed. 2d 521 (1978)(followed)
- Charles v. Daley, 799 F.2d 343, 347-48 (7th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Midland Coal Co. v. Director, OWCP, 149 F.3d 558, 563-64 (7th Cir. 1998)(analogized)
- FTC v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Co., 344 U.S. 206, 211, 73 S. Ct. 245, 97 L. Ed. 245 (1952)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…