Sommerfield v. City of Chicago

863 F.3d 645 (7th Cir. 2017) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · July 12, 2017

Summary

The Seventh Circuit affirmed a judgment in favor of Chicago Police Officer Detlef Sommerfield on hostile-work-environment discrimination claims, while upholding summary judgment for the City on retaliation and other claims. The court also affirmed the denial of sanctions related to publicly available City Council resolutions. It upheld a reduced attorney-fee award of $430,000, including a reduced lodestar and a 50% reduction for limited success.

Holdings

  1. The staffing decisions did not fall within the scope of Sommerfield's original EEOC charge because the charge described verbal abuse by Knasiak and did not identify the other individuals or conduct involved in the staffing decisions. The district court therefore properly excluded the staffing decisions from the discrimination claims.
  2. The district court properly granted summary judgment limiting the retaliation claim and excluding the staffing decisions because Sommerfield failed to identify particular record evidence establishing a genuine issue of material fact.
  3. The district court did not err, much less commit reversible error, by refusing to sanction the City for failing to disclose publicly available City Council resolutions congratulating Knasiak on his retirement.
  4. The district court properly calculated a lodestar by determining reasonable hours and a reasonable hourly rate and then reduced the lodestar by 50 percent to account for Sommerfield's limited success and problematic litigation conduct.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Sommerfield's alleged retaliatory staffing decisions fell within the scope of his original EEOC charge and could support his Title VII discrimination claims.
  2. Whether Sommerfield produced sufficient record evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact on his retaliation claim.
  3. Whether the district court erred by denying sanctions based on the City's failure to provide publicly available City Council resolutions concerning Knasiak.
  4. Whether the district court properly calculated and reduced Sommerfield's attorney-fee award by excluding unreasonable hours, applying a reasonable hourly rate, and reducing the lodestar for limited success.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Ezell v. Potter, 400 F.3d 1041, 1046 (7th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Bordelon v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, 811 F.3d 984, 989 (7th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Johnson v. GDF, Inc., 668 F.3d 927, 929 (7th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 430 n.3, 434 (1983)(followed)
  • Montanez v. Simon, 755 F.3d 547, 552, 555-556 (7th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Baker v. Lindgren, 856 F.3d 498, 503-504 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Anderson v. AB Painting & Sandblasting Inc., 578 F.3d 542, 545 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Schlacher v. Law Offices of Phillip J. Rotche & Associates, P.C., 574 F.3d 852, 857 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Richardson v. City of Chicago, Illinois, 740 F.3d 1099, 1103 (7th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…