Jennifer Miller v. Southwest Airlines Company

926 F.3d 898 (7th Cir. 2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · June 13, 2019 · No. No. 18-3476, No. 19-1785

Summary

The Seventh Circuit held that claims under Illinois's Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) against air carriers for using fingerprint timekeeping systems are minor disputes under the Railway Labor Act (RLA) because they require interpretation of collective bargaining agreements, and thus must be submitted to an adjustment board rather than litigated in court. The court also found that the plaintiffs had Article III standing based on the concrete interest in the terms and conditions of employment and the increased risk of data disclosure. The suit against Southwest was affirmed as properly dismissed, and the suit against United was vacated and remanded with instructions to refer the dispute to an adjustment board, with federal question jurisdiction supporting removal.

Holdings

  1. Yes, because the claims necessarily involve the interpretation and application of collective bargaining agreements, and thus must be resolved by an adjustment board, not by a court.
  2. Yes, because the plaintiffs seek a material change in their terms and conditions of employment (discontinuation of fingerprinting or higher wages), and because the alleged retention of biometric data and use of third parties creates a risk of disclosure, which is a concrete injury.
  3. Yes, a union qualifies as a legally authorized representative under BIPA.
  4. Yes, because the claims are completely preempted by the Railway Labor Act, thus arising under federal law for jurisdictional purposes.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiffs' BIPA claims against air carriers constitute 'minor disputes' under the Railway Labor Act that must be resolved by an adjustment board.
  2. Whether the plaintiffs have Article III standing to sue under BIPA.
  3. Whether the suit against United Airlines was properly removed to federal court.

Disposition

The judgment in Miller v. Southwest Airlines is affirmed. The judgment in Johnson v. United Airlines is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to refer the parties' dispute to an adjustment board.

Cases Cited (23)

  • Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris, 512 U.S. 246, 252-53 (1994)(cited)
  • Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016)(cited)
  • Groshek v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., 865 F.3d 884 (7th Cir. 2017)(cited)
  • Casillas v. Madison Avenue Associates, Inc., No. 17-3162 (7th Cir. June 4, 2019)(cited)
  • Robertson v. Allied Solutions, LLC, 902 F.3d 690, 697 (7th Cir. 2018)(cited)
  • Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLC, 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2015)(cited)
  • Lewert v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc., 819 F.3d 963 (7th Cir. 2016)(cited)
  • Dieffenbach v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 887 F.3d 826 (7th Cir. 2018)(cited)
  • Carlson v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 758 F.3d 819, 824-25 (7th Cir. 2014)(cited)
  • Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Norfolk Southern Ry., 745 F.3d 808 (7th Cir. 2014)(cited)

Showing top 10 of 23.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…