Summary
The Seventh Circuit held that a noncitizen who makes a timely objection to a procedurally defective Notice to Appear (NTA) is entitled to relief without showing prejudice, as the NTA requirements under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) are mandatory claims-processing rules. The court distinguished its prior decision in *Alvarez-Espino v. Barr*, which required prejudice only when the objection was untimely. Citing *Niz-Chavez v. Garland* and *Ortiz-Santiago v. Barr*, the panel granted the petition for review and remanded, rejecting the BIA's imposition of a prejudice requirement for timely objections.
Holdings
- A noncitizen who raises a timely objection to a noncompliant Notice to Appear is entitled to relief without also having to show prejudice from the defect.
Questions Presented
- Whether a noncitizen who timely objects to a defective Notice to Appear must also show prejudice to obtain dismissal of removal proceedings.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (8)
- Ortiz-Santiago v. Barr, 924 F.3d 956 (7th Cir. 2019)(cited)
- Alvarez-Espino v. Barr, 959 F.3d 813 (7th Cir. 2020)(distinguished)
- Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021)(cited)
- Pereira v. Sessions, Periera v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018)(cited)
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13 (2017)(cited)
- Sobaleva v. Holder, 760 F.3d 592 (7th Cir. 2014)(cited)
- Ahmed v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 611 (7th Cir. 2003)(cited)
- Vyloha v. Barr, 929 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…