Cristian Avila de la Rosa v. Merrick B. Garland

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · June 24, 2021 · No. 20-1956

Summary

The Seventh Circuit held that a noncitizen who makes a timely objection to a procedurally defective Notice to Appear (NTA) is entitled to relief without showing prejudice, as the NTA requirements under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) are mandatory claims-processing rules. The court distinguished its prior decision in *Alvarez-Espino v. Barr*, which required prejudice only when the objection was untimely. Citing *Niz-Chavez v. Garland* and *Ortiz-Santiago v. Barr*, the panel granted the petition for review and remanded, rejecting the BIA's imposition of a prejudice requirement for timely objections.

Holdings

  1. A noncitizen who raises a timely objection to a noncompliant Notice to Appear is entitled to relief without also having to show prejudice from the defect.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a noncitizen who timely objects to a defective Notice to Appear must also show prejudice to obtain dismissal of removal proceedings.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (8)

  • Ortiz-Santiago v. Barr, 924 F.3d 956 (7th Cir. 2019)(cited)
  • Alvarez-Espino v. Barr, 959 F.3d 813 (7th Cir. 2020)(distinguished)
  • Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021)(cited)
  • Pereira v. Sessions, Periera v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018)(cited)
  • Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13 (2017)(cited)
  • Sobaleva v. Holder, 760 F.3d 592 (7th Cir. 2014)(cited)
  • Ahmed v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 611 (7th Cir. 2003)(cited)
  • Vyloha v. Barr, 929 F.3d 812 (7th Cir. 2019)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…