Summary
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's disposition of Hancock's bankruptcy appeal based on his repeated and flagrant failure to comply with briefing deadlines, page limits, formatting requirements, and show-cause orders. The court held that intermediate review of a bankruptcy court decision could not be bypassed and that the record justified resolving the appeal without reaching the merits. Chief Judge Batchelder concurred in the conclusion, characterizing the district court's action more accurately as a dismissal rather than a summary affirmance.
Holdings
- Summary disposition without consideration of the merits was appropriate where the appellant established a clear record of delay and contumacious conduct and lesser sanctions would not better serve the interests of justice.
- An appellant may not bypass the required intermediate review by the district court or Bankruptcy Appellate Panel; parties must comply with the procedures governing appeals from bankruptcy court to the intermediate reviewing court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court properly disposed of Hancock's bankruptcy appeal without reaching the merits because of his repeated violations of bankruptcy and district-court appellate rules.
- Whether an appellant may bypass required intermediate district-court review in a bankruptcy appeal by failing to prosecute the appeal in the district court.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Gooding, 703 F.2d 230, 233 (6th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Thomas v. Corr. Med. Ctr., No. 98-3492, 1999 WL 283894, at *1 (6th Cir. Apr. 27, 1999)(followed)
- McMillan v. LTV Steel, Inc., 555 F.3d 218, 225 (6th Cir. 2009)(clarified)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…