Curtis Etherton v. Service First Logistics, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · March 30, 2020 · No. No. 19-1362

Summary

Res judicata (claim preclusion) barred former employees' FLSA overtime claims against their employer because they arose from the same employment relationship as a prior state-court non-compete suit, could have been raised as counterclaims, and the parties stipulated to dismiss "all claims … which could have been raised." Applying Michigan's transactional test, the Sixth Circuit held that the employees' duties and compensation were intertwined with the non-compete agreement, making the two suits a convenient trial unit. The dissent argued the overtime claims (based on conduct during employment) and the non-compete claims (based on post-employment conduct) involved separate transactions.

Holdings

  1. Res judicata bars the overtime claims because they arise from the same transaction as the non-compete claims under Michigan's transactional test.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether res judicata bars Etherton and Fuller from bringing their overtime claims after they settled a prior state court action brought by Service First for non-compete violations.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (29)

  • San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City & Cty. of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005)(cited for general principle)
  • Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90 (1980)(cited for general principle)
  • AuSable River Trading Post, LLC v. Dovetail Sols., Inc., 874 F.3d 271 (6th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Adair v. State, 680 N.W.2d 386 (Mich. 2004)(followed)
  • Sewell v. Clean Cut Mgmt., Inc., 621 N.W.2d 222 (Mich. 2001)(cited for elements)
  • Limbach v. Oakland Cty. Bd. of Cty. Rd. Comm'rs, 573 N.W.2d 336 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997)(cited for proposition)
  • Gose v. Monroe Auto Equip. Co., 294 N.W.2d 165 (Mich. 1980)(cited for historical test)
  • Leslie v. Mollica, 211 N.W. 267 (Mich. 1926)(cited for narrower rule)
  • Ternes Steel Co. v. Ladney, 111 N.W.2d 859 (Mich. 1961)(cited for narrower rule)
  • Stanton v. Auto Owners Ins. Co., 2016 WL 6269614 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016)(cited as applying transactional test to counterclaims)

Showing top 10 of 29.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…