Summary
The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a corrected written sentence in Bobby Lee Saviory’s criminal case. The court held that the trial court had orally imposed legal sentences, and that correcting a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing documents was a ministerial correction rather than a resentencing requiring appointment of counsel. The opinion also addressed the scope of the prior remand concerning Saviory’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion.
Holdings
- The successor postconviction court did not conduct a resentencing requiring appointment of counsel; it performed the ministerial task of correcting written sentencing documents to conform to the legal sentence orally imposed at the original sentencing.
- Saviory was not entitled to correction of an illegal sentence because the sentence orally imposed by the trial court was legal; the written judgment could be corrected to reflect that oral sentence.
Questions Presented
- Whether the successor postconviction court conducted an impermissible resentencing without appointing counsel when it corrected the written sentencing documents after reviewing the original sentencing transcript.
- Whether Saviory was entitled to relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) when the oral sentence was legal but the written sentence contained a scrivener's error.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- Saviory v. State, 348 So. 3d 1206, 1207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)(followed in describing remand)
- State v. Akins, 69 So. 3d 261, 269 (Fla. 2011)(applied)
- Taylor v. State, 140 So. 3d 526, 529 (Fla. 2014)(followed)
- State v. Scott, 439 So. 2d 219, 220-21 (Fla. 1983)(followed)
- Jordan v. State, 143 So. 3d 335, 338 (Fla. 2014)(followed)
- Acosta v. State, 46 So. 3d 1179, 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)(followed)
- Lovett v. State, 395 So. 3d 1113, 1115 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024)(followed)
- Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603 (Fla. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…