Summary
The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed a trial court order granting summary judgment to Lakeland Regional Medical Center and the defendant physicians in a medical-malpractice-related action. The court concluded that the appellant had not demonstrated reversible error, citing authority concerning the retroactive application of statutes of limitations.
Holdings
- A modified statute-of-limitations period may apply to existing rights when a reasonable time is provided after enactment and before the new period operates as a bar for the party to exercise the right.
- The issues were not unpreserved merely because the trial court did not expressly rule on them; absent stated reasoning, an appellate court presumes that intermediary conclusions were resolved in favor of the trial court's ultimate conclusion.
- Reversible error was not demonstrated, and the order granting summary judgment for the appellees was affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees in light of the statute-of-limitations and retroactivity issues raised on appeal.
- Whether the issues raised on appeal were preserved despite the trial court's failure to expressly rule on them.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Bauld v. J.A. Jones Construction Co., 357 So. 2d 401, 403 (Fla. 1978)(followed)
- Hart v. Bostwick, 14 Fla. 162, 181 (1872)(followed)
- Hughes v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 374 So. 3d 900, 905 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023)(followed)
- Smith v. Barney Inc. v. Potter, 725 So. 2d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…