Summary
The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed Matthew Edward Zink’s judgment and life sentence for lewd and lascivious molestation of a child under 12. The court upheld the exclusion of alleged child-hearsay testimony and concluded that any error in the trial court’s prison releasee reoffender finding was harmless because the offense independently subjected Zink to a life sentence.
Holdings
- The court affirmed the trial court's finding that the alleged child-hearsay statements were inadmissible, without further comment.
- Any error in the trial court's finding concerning Zink's prior release date was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because the offense independently subjected Zink to a life sentence, meaning he was not serving an enhanced sentence as a result of the prison releasee reoffender designation.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court erred by excluding a witness's testimony concerning alleged child-hearsay statements.
- Whether Zink's prison releasee reoffender designation was illegal because the trial court, rather than a jury, found the date of his release from custody on a prior conviction.
- Whether any error in the prison releasee reoffender designation was harmless when the underlying offense independently subjected Zink to a life sentence.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024)(considered)
- Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023)(followed)
- Avalos v. State, 419 So. 3d 299, 300 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025)(followed)
- Scott v. State, 413 So. 3d 276, 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025)(followed by analogy)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…