Summary
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that a dangerousness hearing under Massachusetts General Laws chapter 276, § 58A, may proceed when a juvenile has been found legally incompetent, subject to due process safeguards. The court further held that the Commonwealth may rely solely on sufficiently reliable hearsay, including police reports and videotaped statements, provided the evidence supports a finding of dangerousness by clear and convincing evidence. The court also concluded that incompetency-related delay is excluded from the ninety-day detention limit, although continued detention remains subject to constitutional due process limitations.
Holdings
- It is not per se a violation of due process to conduct a G. L. c. 276, § 58A, dangerousness hearing for a juvenile who has been found incompetent to stand trial, provided appropriate safeguards permit a reliable determination of dangerousness.
- The Commonwealth may satisfy its burden at a § 58A dangerousness hearing solely with hearsay evidence if the hearsay is substantially reliable or there is good cause for not presenting live testimony; the evidence in this case met that standard.
- The ninety-day § 58A detention period excludes periods of delay caused by mental incompetency, but continued detention of an incompetent juvenile is constitutionally limited and requires findings concerning the likelihood of restoration, progress toward competency, and whether the detention has become unreasonable.
Questions Presented
- Whether a dangerousness hearing under G. L. c. 276, § 58A, may be conducted when a juvenile has been found incompetent to stand trial.
- Whether the Commonwealth may satisfy its burden at a § 58A dangerousness hearing solely through hearsay evidence, including police reports and videotaped interrogations, without presenting live testimony.
- Whether a juvenile detained after a § 58A dangerousness hearing may be held beyond the statutory ninety-day period while remaining incompetent to stand trial, subject to due process limitations.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (29)
- Abbott A. v. Commonwealth, 455 Mass. 1005, 1006 (2009)(prior history)
- Commonwealth v. Hill, 375 Mass. 50, 52 (1978)(followed)
- Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 402 (1960)(followed)
- Commonwealth v. Robidoux, 450 Mass. 144, 152-153 (2007)(followed)
- Commonwealth v. L'Abbe, 421 Mass. 262, 266 (1995)(followed)
- Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162, 171 (1975)(followed)
- Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 733, 738, 740-741 (1972)(followed)
- Commonwealth v. Torres, 441 Mass. 499, 502-507 (2004)(followed and extended)
- United States v. Magassouba, 544 F.3d 387, 413, 416-417 (2d Cir. 2008)(persuasive)
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 29.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.