Summary
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that Norwegian Cruise Line violated Massachusetts travel-service regulations by failing to disclose its complete refund policy and by failing to issue a timely refund after the plaintiffs cancelled their cruise. The court concluded that these violations constituted unfair or deceptive acts under G. L. c. 93A and caused the plaintiffs a compensable loss. The court also held that the plaintiffs’ demand letter adequately described their claim and remanded for determination of damages, attorney’s fees, and costs.
Holdings
- Norwegian violated 940 Code Mass. Regs. § 15.04 by failing to disclose the complete terms of its refund policy before accepting payment and by failing to refund the Casavants' payments within thirty days after their cancellation.
- The regulatory violations caused the Casavants a loss within the meaning of G. L. c. 93A because Norwegian's failure to provide the required prompt refund deprived them of the ticket price.
- The Casavants' demand letter satisfied G. L. c. 93A, § 9(3), because it fairly notified Norwegian of the conduct complained of, the injury suffered, and the relief sought; it was not required to identify every specific statutory or regulatory violation.
Questions Presented
- Whether Norwegian's failure to disclose its complete cancellation or refund policy violated 940 Code Mass. Regs. § 15.04(2)(e) and constituted an unfair or deceptive act or practice under G. L. c. 93A.
- Whether the regulatory violations caused the Casavants a compensable loss under G. L. c. 93A.
- Whether the Casavants' demand letter satisfied G. L. c. 93A, § 9(3), even though it did not identify the specific Attorney General regulation later relied upon.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (15)
- Anastos v. Sable, 443 Mass. 146, 149 (2004)(followed)
- R.W. Granger & Sons v. J & S Insulation, Inc., 435 Mass. 66, 73 (2001)(followed)
- Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp., 31 Mass. App. Ct. 390, 414 (1991), S.C., 412 Mass. 703 (1992)(followed)
- Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Boston, Inc., 445 Mass. 790, 796, 802 (2006)(followed)
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co., 451 Mass. 623, 630-631 n.12 (2008)(followed)
- International Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Wilson, 387 Mass. 841, 850 (1983)(followed)
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney Gen., 380 Mass. 762, 775 (1980)(followed)
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc., 366 Mass. 688, 704 (1975)(followed)
- Spring v. Geriatric Authority of Holyoke, 394 Mass. 274, 288 (1985)(followed)
- York v. Sullivan, 369 Mass. 157, 162-163 (1975)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…