Summary
The Tenth Circuit held that Oklahoma law governed the award of prejudgment interest in diversity actions involving personal-injury damages. It affirmed interest on the compensatory personal-injury award but reversed interest on exemplary damages because those damages were punitive rather than compensatory.
Holdings
- In a diversity action, the availability of prejudgment interest is governed by applicable state law rather than by an independent federal rule, and Oklahoma law governed here.
- Oklahoma law authorized prejudgment interest on the damages awarded for personal injuries.
- Prejudgment interest was not authorized on the punitive-damage award because punitive damages are penal rather than compensatory and are not damages by reason of personal injury within the Oklahoma interest statute.
Questions Presented
- Whether Oklahoma or federal law governed the availability of prejudgment interest in the diversity personal-injury actions.
- Whether Oklahoma law authorized prejudgment interest on the personal-injury damages.
- Whether Oklahoma law authorized prejudgment interest on the punitive-damage award.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (16)
- Benson v. Blair, 515 P.2d 1363 (Okla. 1973)(followed in part)
- Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)(applied)
- Massachusetts Benefit Association v. Miles, 137 U.S. 689 (1891)(followed)
- Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. Export Drum Co., 359 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1966)(followed)
- Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. Amirault, 202 F.2d 893 (1st Cir. 1953)(followed)
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Soileau, 167 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1948)(followed)
- Oresman v. G. D. Searle & Co., 388 F. Supp. 1175 (D.R.I. 1975)(followed)
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. York, 326 U.S. 99 (1945)(applied)
- Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965)(applied)
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., Inc., 313 U.S. 487 (1941)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…