Summary
The Tenth Circuit certified questions to the Utah Supreme Court concerning whether Utah Code Ann. § 70C-7-103 creates a bankruptcy exemption for wages or merely limits garnishment outside bankruptcy. The court also asked whether pre-petition wages qualify as disposable earnings and whether the underlying debts arose from a consumer credit agreement. The appeal was stayed pending the Utah Supreme Court’s consideration of the certified questions.
Holdings
- 15 U.S.C. § 1673 does not create an exemption in bankruptcy and therefore has no bearing on the debtor's claimed exemption.
- The questions concerning whether Utah Code Ann. § 70C-7-103 creates a bankruptcy exemption, whether the wages qualify as disposable earnings, and whether the debts arose from a consumer credit agreement should be certified to the Utah Supreme Court because they control the appeal and have not been answered by Utah courts.
Questions Presented
- Whether 15 U.S.C. § 1673 creates an exemption in bankruptcy for the debtor's pre-petition wages.
- Whether Utah Code Ann. § 70C-7-103 creates an exemption in bankruptcy or merely limits a judgment creditor's garnishment remedy outside bankruptcy.
- If Utah Code Ann. § 70C-7-103 creates a bankruptcy exemption, whether the debtor's pre-petition wages qualify as disposable earnings under the statute.
- If the wages qualify as disposable earnings, whether the debts at issue arose from a consumer credit agreement under Utah Code Ann. § 70C-7-103.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- In re Stewart, 32 B.R. 132, 139 (Bankr. D. Utah 1983)(discussed)
- Kokoszka v. Belford, 417 U.S. 642, 94 S. Ct. 2431, 41 L. Ed. 2d 374 (1974)(followed)
- Smith v. Frazier, 421 B.R. 513, 518 (S.D. Ill. 2009)(relied upon)
- In re Riendeau, 293 B.R. 832, 838-39 (D. Vt. 2002)(relied upon)
- In re W. Side Prop. Assocs., 13 P.3d 168, 170-71 (Utah 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…