Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals for the Third District, on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, considered whether Gary Griffin was entitled to an out-of-time appeal from the denial of his first application for habeas corpus. The court held that a 93-day delay in seeking the out-of-time appeal did not bar relief because there was no statutory deadline and a breakdown in the system had prevented a timely appeal. The court reversed the denial of Griffin’s second habeas application and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- A ninety-three-day delay in requesting an out-of-time appeal does not disqualify a habeas applicant from relief when there is no statutory deadline for requesting the out-of-time appeal.
- When a breakdown in the system prevents a habeas applicant from timely filing a proper notice of appeal, due process requires that the applicant be permitted to exercise the statutory right of appeal.
- Griffin was entitled to an out-of-time appeal from the denial of his first application for writ of habeas corpus.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ninety-three-day delay in requesting an out-of-time appeal, absent a statutory deadline, disqualified Griffin from obtaining that relief.
- Whether the breakdown caused by the clerk's failure to provide timely notice required protection of Griffin's right to appeal under due process and Ex parte Riley.
- Whether the habeas court erred by denying Griffin's second article 11.072 application to the extent it relied on the delay in seeking an out-of-time appeal.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- Griffin v. State, No. 03-15-00398-CR, 2017 WL 2229869, at *9 (Tex. App.—Austin May 19, 2017, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(prior history)
- Ex parte Griffin, 703 S.W.3d 831 (Tex. App.—Austin 2024) (op. on reh'g), vacated and remanded, No. PD-0611-24, 2025 WL 2576270 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 3, 2025) (per curiam)(vacated)
- Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900, 901-02 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Supreme Jud. Dist., 769 S.W.2d 554, 558-59 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)(followed)
- Ex parte Valdez, 489 S.W.3d 462, 465 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016)(followed)
- Ex parte McCarty, No. 03-14-00575-CR, 2015 WL 2089091, at *3-04 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 29, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…