Ex parte Gary Griffin

No. 03-21-00198-CR · Texas Court of Appeals, Third District at Austin · November 26, 2025 · No. No. 03-21-00198-CR

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals for the Third District, on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, considered whether Gary Griffin was entitled to an out-of-time appeal from the denial of his first application for habeas corpus. The court held that a 93-day delay in seeking the out-of-time appeal did not bar relief because there was no statutory deadline and a breakdown in the system had prevented a timely appeal. The court reversed the denial of Griffin’s second habeas application and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. A ninety-three-day delay in requesting an out-of-time appeal does not disqualify a habeas applicant from relief when there is no statutory deadline for requesting the out-of-time appeal.
  2. When a breakdown in the system prevents a habeas applicant from timely filing a proper notice of appeal, due process requires that the applicant be permitted to exercise the statutory right of appeal.
  3. Griffin was entitled to an out-of-time appeal from the denial of his first application for writ of habeas corpus.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ninety-three-day delay in requesting an out-of-time appeal, absent a statutory deadline, disqualified Griffin from obtaining that relief.
  2. Whether the breakdown caused by the clerk's failure to provide timely notice required protection of Griffin's right to appeal under due process and Ex parte Riley.
  3. Whether the habeas court erred by denying Griffin's second article 11.072 application to the extent it relied on the delay in seeking an out-of-time appeal.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (6)

  • Griffin v. State, No. 03-15-00398-CR, 2017 WL 2229869, at *9 (Tex. App.—Austin May 19, 2017, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(prior history)
  • Ex parte Griffin, 703 S.W.3d 831 (Tex. App.—Austin 2024) (op. on reh'g), vacated and remanded, No. PD-0611-24, 2025 WL 2576270 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 3, 2025) (per curiam)(vacated)
  • Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900, 901-02 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(followed)
  • Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Supreme Jud. Dist., 769 S.W.2d 554, 558-59 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)(followed)
  • Ex parte Valdez, 489 S.W.3d 462, 465 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016)(followed)
  • Ex parte McCarty, No. 03-14-00575-CR, 2015 WL 2089091, at *3-04 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 29, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…