Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, dismissed Brandon Williams’s attempted appeal for want of jurisdiction because his notice of appeal from the August 2024 protective-order judgment was filed in January 2026. The court held that the protective order was the final judgment and that Williams missed both the applicable notice-of-appeal deadline and the window for seeking an extension.
Holdings
- Because the protective order disposed of the only claim in the suit, the protective order signed on August 16, 2024 was the final judgment.
- A timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement, and Williams's notice filed well after the applicable deadline did not invoke the court's jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the August 16, 2024 protective order was the final judgment from which the appellate deadline began to run.
- Whether Williams's January 7, 2026 notice of appeal and January 6, 2026 extension motion were timely enough to invoke the court's appellate jurisdiction.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- B.C. v. Rhodes, 116 S.W.3d 878, 881–82 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003, no pet.)(followed)
- Baker v. Bizzle, 687 S.W.3d 285, 291–92 (Tex. 2024)(followed)
- Connally v. Mannas, No. 03-24-00167-CV, 2024 WL 3954529, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 28, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.)(followed)
- Houser v. McElveen, 243 S.W.3d 646, 646 (Tex. 2008) (per curiam)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…