Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, reviewed an Anders appeal from Herman Lee Kindred’s conviction for assault family violence and one-year county-jail sentence. The court found no reversible error or arguable grounds for review, granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirmed the trial court’s judgment.
Holdings
- Appointed appellate counsel satisfied the requirements of Anders by providing a professional evaluation of the record, filing a motion to withdraw and supporting brief, providing the materials to appellant, and advising appellant of his rights to review the record, file a pro se brief, and seek discretionary review.
- The record contained no reversible error and presented no arguably meritorious grounds for review; the appeal was frivolous.
Questions Presented
- Whether appointed appellate counsel satisfied the requirements of Anders v. California by filing a brief demonstrating that the record presented no arguable grounds for appeal and by advising appellant of his rights.
- Whether the appellate record contained reversible error or any arguably meritorious ground for review.
- Whether counsel's motion to withdraw should be granted and the judgment of conviction affirmed.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)(followed)
- Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009)(followed)
- Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988)(followed)
- Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(followed)
- Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…