Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, abated and remanded an Anders appeal involving convictions for aggravated sexual assault of a minor and indecency with a child. The court directed the trial court to determine appropriate safeguards for the appellant’s access to the appellate record, verify whether a nunc pro tunc judgment accurately reflected the guilty plea, and prepare supplemental records before July 1, 2026.
Holdings
- The appeal must be abated and remanded for the trial court to conduct a hearing and determine appropriate precautionary measures for providing appellant access to the appellate record, including sensitive photographs, while satisfying Anders requirements.
- On remand, the trial court must consider whether the guilty plea stated in the nunc pro tunc judgment for indecency with a child accurately comports with the record and must issue a new nunc pro tunc judgment if it does not.
Questions Presented
- What safeguards, if any, should govern appellant's access to the appellate record in an Anders appeal when the record contains photographs of the victim?
- Whether the nunc pro tunc judgment of conviction for indecency with a child accurately reflects the record regarding appellant's guilty plea.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (5)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)(followed)
- Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(followed)
- Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321 & n.24 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(followed)
- Santa Ana v. State, No. 03-25-00928-CR, 2026 WL 1501155, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin May 27, 2026, order)(followed)
- Vaccaro v. State, 195 S.W.3d 351, 353 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, order)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…