Gerald Lee Manzanalez Jr. v. The State of Texas

No. 13-25-00369-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Apr. 30, 2026) (mem. op.) · Texas Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi–Edinburg · April 30, 2026 · No. 13-25-00369-CR

Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed Gerald Lee Manzanalez Jr.'s convictions for attempted sexual assault of a child and attempted indecency with a child. The court held that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, was sufficient to establish the requisite intent and conduct beyond mere preparation.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient for a rational fact finder to find beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant possessed the specific intent to commit the underlying offenses and performed acts beyond mere preparation that tended but failed to effect their commission.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that appellant had the specific intent to commit sexual assault of a child and attempted that offense.
  2. Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that appellant had the specific intent to commit indecency with a child and attempted that offense.
  3. Whether appellant's conduct constituted more than mere preparation to commit the intended offenses.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (10)

  • McClendon v. State, 643 S.W.2d 936, 936 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1982)(followed)
  • Whatley v. State, 445 S.W.3d 159, 166 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(followed)
  • Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893, 898–99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (plurality op.)(followed)
  • Wise v. State, 364 S.W.3d 900, 903 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012)(followed)
  • Villarreal v. State, 286 S.W.3d 321, 327 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009)(followed)
  • Malik v. State, 953 S.W.2d 234, 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)(followed)
  • Crawford v. State, 562 S.W.3d 106, 111 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2018, pet. ref’d)(followed)
  • Henson v. State, 173 S.W.3d 92, 101 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2005, pet. ref’d)(followed)
  • In re J.B.M., 157 S.W.3d 823, 826 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.)(analogized)
  • Dixon v. State, No. 01-04-01100-CR, 2005 WL 2620541, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 13, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…