Deborah Geraci v. Academy, Ltd. D/B/A Academy Sports & Outdoors

Geraci v. Academy, Ltd., No. 25-599 (La. Ct. App. May 6, 2026) · Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit · May 6, 2026 · No. 25-599; CA-0025-0599

Summary

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, affirmed summary judgment dismissing Deborah Geraci’s premises-liability claims against Academy, Ltd. The court held that Geraci failed to provide evidence satisfying the temporal notice requirement under Louisiana’s Merchant Liability Statute and failed to establish that Academy intentionally destroyed surveillance evidence for purposes of a spoliation claim.

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff pursuing a merchant-liability claim under La. R.S. 9:2800.6 must prove all three statutory requirements, including that the merchant created or had actual or constructive notice of the condition before the occurrence. Constructive notice requires positive evidence that the condition existed for some period of time sufficient to place the merchant on notice. Because the ball escaped from the child and caused the fall within seconds, Geraci offered no evidence that the condition existed long enough to establish constructive notice.
  2. Displaying sporting-goods merchandise in areas accessible to the shopping public is not, by itself, an unreasonably dangerous condition, and a store owner is not required to prevent sudden conduct by children when no reasonable response would have been possible before the injury.
  3. A spoliation claim requires intentional or negligent destruction of evidence for the purpose of depriving the plaintiff of its use, and allegations alone are insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding intentional destruction. No adverse presumption was warranted where the evidence showed that the incident area was not captured by surveillance cameras and that available relevant footage had been preserved and produced.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court improperly weighed evidence and assessed witness credibility in granting summary judgment on Geraci's premises-liability claim.
  2. Whether Geraci presented evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact concerning the temporal element and constructive notice required by Louisiana's Merchant Liability Statute.
  3. Whether Geraci presented evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact that Academy intentionally destroyed surveillance evidence for the purpose of depriving her of its use, and whether an adverse presumption applied.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (21)

  • Bolden v. Tisdale, 347 So. 3d 697 (La. 2022)(followed)
  • White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 699 So. 2d 1081 (La. 1997)(followed)
  • Fountain v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 297 So. 3d 100 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 733 So. 2d 1188 (La. 1999)(followed)
  • Babin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 764 So. 2d 37 (La. 2000)(followed)
  • Birdsong v. Hirsch Memorial Coliseum, 889 So. 2d 1232 (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Jazz Casino Co., L.L.C., 245 So. 3d 68 (La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018), writ denied, 252 So. 3d 877 (La. 2018)(followed)
  • Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans Casino, 158 So. 3d 917 (La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Davis v. Cheema, Inc., 171 So. 3d 984 (La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Smith v. Toys 'R' Us, Inc., 754 So. 2d 209 (La. 1999)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…