Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the circuit court's decision in Glenn Richardson's postconviction appeal. The court held that the reasoning in Erlinger v. United States did not support vacating Richardson's sentence, relying on recent Florida appellate decisions distinguishing direct appeals from postconviction proceedings.
Holdings
- Erlinger does not support vacating a death sentence through postconviction review where Erlinger was a direct-appeal case involving required jury findings regarding an element, rather than a postconviction case involving the challenged sentence.
Questions Presented
- Whether Erlinger v. United States supports postconviction relief or vacatur of Richardson's death sentence.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Ford v. State, 402 So. 3d 973, 981 (Fla. 2025)(followed)
- Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024)(distinguished)
- Tanzi v. State, 407 So. 3d 385, 394–95 (Fla. 2025)(followed)
- Lewis v. State, No. 3D25-0396, 2025 WL 1819465, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA July 2, 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…