Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed final summary judgment for condominium buyers in a breach-of-contract and unjust-enrichment action arising from a failed residential-unit sale. The court held that the buyers’ statutory right to void the agreement continued until closing and that the sellers’ failure to respond to the summary judgment motion permitted the trial court to treat the asserted facts as undisputed. The court dismissed as premature the portion of the appeal concerning attorney’s-fee entitlement.
Holdings
- The trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Buyers and entered final summary judgment.
- The court lacked jurisdiction to review the portion of the summary judgment determining entitlement to attorney's fees because the trial court had not fixed the amount of fees; that portion of the appeal was dismissed as premature and without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment for the Buyers on the Sellers' claims arising from the failed condominium transaction.
- Whether the appellate court had jurisdiction to review the trial court's determination that the Buyers were entitled to attorney's fees when the amount of fees had not yet been fixed.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Priority Med. Ctrs., LLC v. Allstate Ins. Co., 319 So. 3d 724, 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)(followed)
- Volusia Cnty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000)(followed)
- Bydalek v. Saenz, 368 So. 3d 508, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)(followed)
- Aria on the Bay Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Bayshore Plaza I, LLC, 394 So. 3d 95, 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)(followed)
- Lloyd S. Meisels, P.A. v. Dobrofsky, 341 So. 3d 1131, 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)(followed)
- Acosta v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co., 245 So. 3d 882, 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Diaz v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 227 So. 3d 735, 736-37 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…