Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a final judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects. The court rejected challenges to the unequal distribution and valuation of marital debts, noting that the former husband had not provided a trial transcript and had not preserved objections to the absence of factual findings through a motion for rehearing.
Holdings
- When an appellant does not provide a transcript of the lower-court proceedings, the appellate court cannot meaningfully review claims requiring review for competent substantial evidence or abuse of discretion, absent a supportable claim of fundamental error.
- A challenge to the trial court's failure to make required factual findings in a final judgment must be raised in a motion for rehearing in the trial court to be preserved for appeal.
- An equitable distribution determination is reviewed for abuse of discretion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by unequally distributing the marital debts.
- Whether the trial court erred in finding that Former Husband agreed to pay the marital debts.
- Whether the trial court failed to value and equally distribute all of Former Husband's claimed marital debts.
- Whether Former Husband preserved a challenge to the trial court's failure to make required factual findings in the final judgment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Michener v. Michener, 403 So. 3d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)(followed)
- Viscito v. Viscito, 214 So. 3d 736, 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)(followed)
- Magana v. Machado, 406 So. 3d 317, 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…