Sandalwood 7160 LLC v. Gonzalo J. Estevez, et al.

Sandalwood 7160 · Third District Court of Appeal of Florida · April 1, 2026 · No. 3D24-0148

Summary

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a final judgment for the Estevez defendants in a dispute concerning the proposed sale of four properties. The court held that the record did not establish an enforceable agreement sufficiently definite and complete to support specific performance or breach-of-contract relief, citing Florida's statute of frauds and related contract principles.

Holdings

  1. A court may grant specific performance only when the parties entered into an agreement that is definite, certain, and complete in all essential terms; the judgment rejecting Sandalwood's specific-performance claim was affirmed.
  2. The final judgment rejecting Sandalwood's breach-of-contract claim was affirmed because Sandalwood did not establish a binding, enforceable agreement covering the sale of all four properties.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Sandalwood established an enforceable contract for the purchase and sale of all four properties sufficient to support specific performance.
  2. Whether Sandalwood was entitled to recover for breach of contract based on the alleged agreement.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (5)

  • Muniz v. Crystal Lake Project, LLC, 947 So. 2d 464, 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)(followed)
  • Greater N.Y. Corp. v. Cenvill Miami Beach Corp., 620 So. 2d 1068, 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)(followed)
  • Truly Nolen, Inc. v. Atlas Moving & Storage Warehouses, Inc., 125 So. 2d 903, 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)(followed)
  • Gonzalez v. Barrenechea, 170 So. 3d 13, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(followed)
  • Regions Bank v. Maroone Chevrolet, L.L.C., 118 So. 3d 251, 257 (Fla. 2013)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…