Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed an amended final judgment awarding damages to Rubelina Corniel in a first-party insurance dispute. The court held that substantial competent evidence supported the jury’s damages award and declined to reweigh the evidence presented at trial.
Holdings
- The denial was proper because the jury's damages award was supported by substantial competent evidence.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court erred by denying Universal's motion for judgment in accordance with its prior motion for directed verdict because the trial evidence allegedly did not support $4,093.18 of the jury's $32,000 damages award.
- Whether the jury's damages award was supported by substantial competent evidence when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Barbanell, 100 So. 3d 152, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)(followed)
- Alvarez v. All Star Boxing, Inc., 258 So. 3d 508, 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Forbes v. Millionaire Gallery, Inc., 335 So. 3d 1260, 1262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)(followed)
- Siegel v. Cross Senior Care, Inc., 239 So. 3d 738, 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Acosta v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 421 So. 3d 716, 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…