Summary
The court considers the State of Connecticut and the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe's motion for leave to amend their complaint challenging the Secretary of the Interior's handling of proposed amendments to tribal gaming procedures. The court holds that amendment would not cause undue delay or be entirely futile, concluding that two proposed Administrative Procedure Act claims are plausible while a third is unsupported by the governing regulations. The motion to amend is therefore granted in part.
Holdings
- Leave to amend was not barred by undue delay because the case was at an early stage and defendants failed to show undue prejudice, despite plaintiffs' apparent tactical delay.
- The proposed claim was not futile because plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the Secretary failed to provide a satisfactory, reasoned explanation for returning the amendments without approving or disapproving them.
- The Secretary's return of the proposed Pequot Procedures amendments constituted final agency action subject to APA review.
- The proposed claim was not futile because plaintiffs plausibly alleged that political pressure was applied to agency decisionmakers and caused them to consider factors not made relevant by Congress.
- The proposed amendments were not a tribal-state compact under 25 C.F.R. § 293.2 and therefore were not subject to the IGRA's compact deemed-approval provisions.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend despite alleged undue delay.
- Whether the proposed arbitrary-and-capricious claim concerning the Secretary's return of the Pequot Procedures amendments was futile.
- Whether the proposed claim alleging improper political influence on the Secretary's decision was futile.
- Whether the proposed Pequot Procedures amendments constituted a tribal-state compact subject to the IGRA's 45-day deemed-approval provisions.
- Whether the Secretary's return of the proposed amendments constituted final agency action reviewable under the APA.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (17)
- Amador Cty. v. Salazar, 640 F.3d 373, 376, 382 (D.C. Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Connecticut, 913 F.2d 1024, 1026-27, 1032 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 975 (1991)(followed)
- Commodore-Mensah v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 842 F. Supp. 2d 50, 52 (D.D.C. 2012)(followed)
- Doe v. McMillan, 566 F.2d 713, 720 (D.C. Cir. 1977)(followed)
- Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)(followed)
- United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc., 301 F.R.D. 5, 8 (D.D.C. 2013)(followed)
- Flaherty v. Pritzker, 322 F.R.D. 44, 46 (D.D.C. 2017)(followed)
- State Farm, 463 U.S. at 43, 57(followed)
- Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 177-78 (1997)(followed)
- Soundboard Ass'n v. FTC, 888 F.3d 1261, 1267-69 (D.C. Cir. 2018)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…