Summary
The Supreme Court addresses the order and allocation of proof in a private employment-discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It holds that a claimant may establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination, after which the employer must articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its decision; the claimant must then have an opportunity to show that the reason is pretextual. The Court vacated and remanded for further proceedings concerning the respondent's racial-discrimination claim.
Holdings
- A complainant who timely files discrimination charges with the EEOC and receives and acts upon the statutory notice of the right to sue may bring a Title VII action even if the Commission has made no reasonable-cause determination.
- The complainant initially bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case by showing that he belongs to a racial minority, applied and was qualified for a position for which the employer sought applicants, was rejected despite his qualifications, and that the position remained open while the employer continued seeking similarly qualified applicants.
- After the complainant establishes a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the employer to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the rejection.
- Even when an employer identifies unlawful conduct as a legitimate reason for refusing to rehire, the applicant must be given a fair opportunity to prove that the stated reason was pretextual or was applied discriminatorily; an employer may rely on the criterion only if it is applied alike to members of all races.
Questions Presented
- Whether an EEOC reasonable-cause determination is a prerequisite to bringing a Title VII racial-discrimination claim in federal court.
- What order and allocation of proof govern a private, non-class Title VII action alleging discriminatory refusal to hire or rehire.
- Whether an employer may rely on an applicant's unlawful conduct directed against the employer as a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for refusing to rehire, subject to proof that the reason was a pretext or was applied discriminatorily.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (12)
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 429-431 (1971)(applied and distinguished)
- NLRB v. Fansteel Corp., 306 U.S. 240, 255 (1939)(applied by analogy)
- Garner v. Los Angeles Board, 341 U.S. 716, 720 (1951)(applied by analogy)
- Robinson v. Lorillard Corp., 444 F.2d 791, 800 (4th Cir. 1971)(followed)
- Beverly v. Lone Star Lead Construction Corp., 437 F.2d 1136 (5th Cir. 1971)(followed)
- Flowers v. Local 6, Laborers International Union of North America, 431 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1970)(followed)
- Fekete v. U.S. Steel Corp., 424 F.2d 331 (3d Cir. 1970)(followed)
- Jones v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., 431 F.2d 245 (10th Cir. 1970)(applied)
- Castro v. Beecher, 459 F.2d 725 (1st Cir. 1972)(cited)
- Chance v. Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167 (2d Cir. 1972)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…