Summary
The Supreme Court held that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not prohibit Michigan's voters from deciding whether to prohibit the consideration of racial preferences in governmental decisions, including university admissions.
Holdings
- The amendment is constitutional; the judgment of the Sixth Circuit is reversed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Michigan constitutional amendment prohibiting race‑based preferences in public university admissions violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (7)
- Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003)(cited)
- Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003)(cited)
- Washington v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 (1982)(distinguished)
- Hunter v. Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969)(distinguished)
- Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967)(cited)
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007)(cited)
- Coral Constr., Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, 50 Cal. 4th 315 (2010)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…