Summary
The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed judgment as a matter of law for State Farm in an insurance agent’s breach-of-contract action. The court held that the agent agreement unambiguously permitted either party to terminate the relationship by written notice at will, and that the contractual termination-review procedure did not alter that at-will character.
Holdings
- The Agent's Agreement unambiguously permitted either party to terminate the agreement at any time by written notice.
- The availability of a termination-review procedure did not change the at-will character of the Agent's Agreement or require State Farm to establish cause before terminating the relationship.
- State Farm was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because it provided written notice of termination and the Agent's Agreement allowed termination at any time with or without cause.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Agent's Agreement was ambiguous because it permitted termination by written notice while also providing a termination-review procedure.
- Whether the termination-review provision altered the agreement's at-will character and required State Farm to have cause before terminating Gardner.
- Whether State Farm was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Gardner's breach-of-contract claim.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (24)
- Glenlakes Realty Co. v. Norwood, 721 So. 2d 174, 177 (Ala. 1998)(followed)
- Bussey v. John Deere Co., 531 So. 2d 860, 863 (Ala. 1988)(followed)
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. Leggett, 744 So. 2d 890, 893-894 (Ala. 1999)(followed)
- Environmental Systems, Inc. v. Rexham Corp., 624 So. 2d 1379, 1381 (Ala. 1993)(followed)
- Smith v. Reynolds Metals Co., 497 So. 2d 93, 95 (Ala. 1986)(followed)
- Salter v. Alfa Ins. Co., Inc., 561 So. 2d 1050, 1051-1053 (Ala. 1990)(followed)
- Bosarge v. Bankers Life Co., 541 So. 2d 499, 500-501 (Ala. 1989)(followed)
- Burrell v. Carraway Methodist Hospitals of Alabama, Inc., 607 So. 2d 193 (Ala. 1992)(distinguished)
- P & S Business, Inc. v. South Central Bell Tel. Co., 466 So. 2d 928, 931 (Ala. 1985)(followed)
- Haddox v. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, 449 So. 2d 1226, 1228 (Ala. 1984)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…