Lyles v. Pioneer Housing Systems, Inc.

858 So. 2d 226 (Ala. 2003) · Supreme Court of Alabama · March 14, 2003 · No. 1010908

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court reviewed an order compelling the Lyleses to arbitrate claims arising from defects in a manufactured home. The court held that the Lyleses manifested assent to the arbitration provision in Pioneer’s written warranty by asserting warranty-based claims, but that Pioneer failed to establish assent to a separate, unsigned arbitration agreement covering all disputes. The court affirmed arbitration of warranty disputes, reversed the order as to other claims, and remanded.

Holdings

  1. The Lyleses manifested assent to Pioneer's written warranty and its arbitration provision by asserting claims under the written warranty, including their pending Magnuson-Moss Act claim based on Pioneer's failure to perform its written-warranty obligations. They could not claim the benefits of the warranty while repudiating its arbitration condition.
  2. The warranty's arbitration provision was enforceable because the warranty was a valid contract involving interstate commerce, and Alabama law does not prohibit enforcement of such an arbitration agreement notwithstanding the clause stating that arbitration applies unless prohibited by state law.
  3. Pioneer failed to prove that the Lyleses assented to the separate unsigned arbitration agreement, which purported to require arbitration of all disputes, claims, or controversies. The trial court therefore erred by compelling arbitration of claims beyond warranty disputes.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Lyleses manifested assent to Pioneer's written warranty, including its arbitration provision, by asserting claims based on the warranty.
  2. Whether the warranty language providing that warranty disputes would be arbitrated unless prohibited by state law made the arbitration provision unenforceable under Alabama law.
  3. Whether Pioneer proved that the Lyleses assented to a separate unsigned arbitration agreement requiring arbitration of all disputes, claims, or controversies.
  4. Whether the trial court erred by compelling arbitration of all of the Lyleses' claims rather than only warranty disputes.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (35)

  • Potts v. Baptist Health Sys., Inc., 853 So. 2d 194, 196-97 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • Ex parte Caver, 742 So. 2d 168, 172 n. 4 (Ala. 1999)(followed)
  • American Gen. Fin., Inc. v. Morton, 812 So. 2d 282, 284-85 (Ala. 2001)(followed)
  • Sisters of the Visitation v. Cochran Plastering Co., 775 So. 2d 759 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
  • Brown v. Dewitt, Inc., 808 So. 2d 11, 14 (Ala. 2001)(followed)
  • Brookfield Constr. Co. v. Van Wezel, 841 So. 2d 220, 221 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • AT&T Techns., Inc. v. Communications Workers of America, 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986)(followed)
  • United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 582 (1960)(followed)
  • Ex parte Lovejoy, 790 So. 2d 933 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
  • Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Barger, 773 So. 2d 454, 459 (Ala. 2000)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 35.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…