Summary
The Supreme Court of Alabama granted a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Sumter County, the county sheriff, and deputy sheriffs in a wrongful-death action arising from a detainee's suicide in the county jail. The court held that Sumter County could not be liable for the jail's daily operation or for the acts of the sheriff and deputies, and that the sheriff and deputies were entitled to absolute state immunity under Article I, § 14 of the Alabama Constitution. The court directed the trial court to vacate its order denying the defendants' motion to dismiss and to dismiss them from the case.
Holdings
- A county is not responsible for the daily administration or operation of a county jail, the supervision of inmates, or the hiring, training, and supervision of the sheriff's personnel. A county's jail-related responsibility is limited to providing and maintaining an adequate facility, and the complaint failed to allege a breach of that duty.
- The sheriff and deputy sheriffs were entitled to absolute immunity under Article I, § 14, of the Alabama Constitution because the complaint alleged conduct occurring within the line and scope of their employment and did not allege facts showing otherwise.
- Mandamus was appropriate because the petition challenged the denial of a claim of immunity, a recognized narrow exception to the general rule that interlocutory denials of motions to dismiss are not reviewable by mandamus.
Questions Presented
- Whether Sumter County could be held liable for the alleged negligent daily operation of the county jail, including the hiring, training, supervision, or actions of the sheriff and deputy sheriffs.
- Whether the sheriff and deputy sheriffs were entitled to absolute immunity under Article I, § 14, of the Alabama Constitution for conduct alleged to have occurred within the line and scope of their employment.
- Whether the defendants were entitled to mandamus relief from the trial court's denial of their motion to dismiss.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (22)
- Ex parte Wood, 852 So. 2d 705, 708 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
- Ex parte United Serv. Stations, Inc., 628 So. 2d 501, 503 (Ala. 1993)(followed)
- Ex parte Butts, 775 So. 2d 173, 176 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
- Ex parte Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 825 So. 2d 758, 761-62 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
- Ex parte Haralson, 853 So. 2d 928, 930-31 (Ala. 2003)(followed)
- Armory Comm'n of Alabama v. Staudt, 388 So. 2d 991, 993 (Ala. 1980)(followed)
- Wassman v. Mobile County Communications Dist., 665 So. 2d 941, 943 (Ala. 1995)(followed)
- Jackson v. City of Florence, 294 Ala. 592, 600, 320 So. 2d 68, 75 (1975)(followed)
- Tuscaloosa County v. Alabama Great Southern R.R., 227 Ala. 428, 150 So. 328 (1933)(followed)
- Keeton v. Fayette County, 558 So. 2d 884, 886 (Ala. 1989)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.