Russell Petroleum, Inc. v. City of Wetumpka

976 So. 2d 428 (Ala. 2007) · Supreme Court of Alabama · June 15, 2007 · No. 1041001

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court reviewed a challenge to the annexation of property into the City of Wetumpka and the City's assessment of business-license fees, gasoline taxes, and sales taxes against Russell Petroleum. The court affirmed the validity of the annexation under Alabama Code § 11-42-6(b), concluding that the required map was timely furnished and open to public inspection. It reversed the sales-tax portion of the judgment because the City had not followed the administrative procedures required by the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights and the Local Tax Simplification Act.

Holdings

  1. The annexation was valid because substantial evidence supported the finding that the annexation map was furnished to the Elmore County probate office by the beginning of the public-notice period and was open to public inspection during that period. Section 11-42-6 does not require the map to be indexed, bound, filed, or recorded in a particular manner.
  2. The circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate or order payment of the municipal sales-tax liability because the City did not first comply with the administrative procedures mandated by the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights and Uniform Revenue Procedures Act, as made applicable to municipal sales taxes by the Local Tax Simplification Act.
  3. Russell Petroleum did not waive its objection to the circuit court's jurisdiction by paying sales-tax funds into court or withholding other sales taxes.
  4. Because the annexation was valid, Russell Petroleum was subject to the City's taxation ordinances after the property became part of the City's municipal limits, and the circuit court had jurisdiction to adjudicate the business-license-fee and municipal-gasoline-tax disputes.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Act No. 2001-543 validly annexed Russell Petroleum's property despite the alleged failure to comply with Ala. Code § 11-42-6(b)'s requirements concerning the filing and public inspection of an annexation map.
  2. Whether the Elmore Circuit Court had subject-matter jurisdiction to order Russell Petroleum to pay municipal sales taxes when the City had not first followed the administrative assessment and review procedures required by the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights and Uniform Revenue Procedures Act and the Local Tax Simplification Act.
  3. Whether Russell Petroleum waived its jurisdictional objection by interpleading sales-tax funds and withholding other sales taxes.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (8)

  • Robinson v. Evans, 959 So. 2d 634 (Ala. 2006)(followed)
  • Transamerica Commercial Fin. Corp. v. AmSouth Bank, N.A., 608 So. 2d 375 (Ala. 1992)(followed)
  • Prince v. Poole, 935 So. 2d 431 (Ala. 2006)(followed)
  • Prowell v. Children's Hosp. of Alabama, 949 So. 2d 117 (Ala. 2006)(followed)
  • Ex parte State Dep't of Revenue, 792 So. 2d 380 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
  • General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. City of Red Bay, 894 So. 2d 650 (Ala. 2004)(followed)
  • Patterson v. Gladwin Corp., 835 So. 2d 137 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • State v. Amerada Hess Corp., 788 So. 2d 179 (Ala. Civ. App. 2000)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…