Banyan Corp. v. Leithead

41 So. 3d 51 (Ala. 2009) · Supreme Court of Alabama · December 11, 2009 · No. 1071078

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court dismissed Banyan Corporation's appeal from a partial summary judgment in favor of W. Bruce Leithead III. The court held that the trial court's Rule 54(b) certification was ineffective because the order did not fully dispose of any substantive claim or fully resolve the claims against any party. The court therefore concluded that the order was not final and appealable.

Holdings

  1. A Rule 54(b) certification is ineffective unless the order completely adjudicates at least one claim or fully disposes of the claims as they relate to at least one party. Because the trial court's order did neither, it was not a final judgment and was not appealable.
  2. The court could not reach the merits because the appealed order was nonfinal and the court lacked appellate jurisdiction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court's partial summary judgment order was a final, appealable judgment under Alabama Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
  2. Whether the Supreme Court of Alabama had jurisdiction to review the trial court's determinations concerning corporate-veil piercing and Banyan's status as a party to the employment contract.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (6)

  • North Alabama Electric Cooperative v. New Hope Telephone Cooperative, 7 So. 3d 342, 344-45 (Ala. 2008)(followed)
  • Powell v. Republic National Life Insurance Co., 293 Ala. 101, 102, 300 So. 2d 359, 360 (1974)(followed)
  • McGowin Investment Co. v. Johnstone, 291 Ala. 714, 715, 287 So. 2d 835, 836 (1973)(followed)
  • Grantham v. Vanderzyl, 802 So. 2d 1077, 1079-80 (Ala. 2001)(followed)
  • Haynes v. Alfa Financial Corp., 730 So. 2d 178, 181 (Ala. 1999)(followed)
  • Tanner v. Alabama Power Co., 617 So. 2d 656, 656 (Ala. 1993)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…