Zurich Insurance Co. v. International Refining & Manufacturing Co.

67 So. 3d 870 (Ala. 2011) · Supreme Court of Alabama · January 14, 2011

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court granted International Refining's petition for a writ of mandamus and directed the Jefferson Circuit Court to transfer Zurich's declaratory-judgment action to the Fayette Circuit Court. The court held that venue was proper in Fayette County under Alabama Code § 6-3-7(a)(1) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the insurance-coverage dispute occurred there. The court also concluded that venue was determined at the commencement of the action and that the underlying Bell Carr litigation was central to the declaratory-judgment claim.

Holdings

  1. Section 6-3-7(a)(1) applies in determining venue for an action against a corporation regardless of whether the corporation is doing business in Alabama.
  2. Fayette County was a proper venue because a substantial part of the events giving rise to Zurich's declaratory-judgment action occurred there.
  3. International Refining established a clear legal right to have the declaratory-judgment action transferred from Jefferson Circuit Court to Fayette Circuit Court, warranting mandamus relief.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Ala. Code § 6-3-7(a)(1) permits venue in Fayette County for Zurich's declaratory-judgment action against International Refining even though International Refining was not qualified to do business and did not do business in Alabama.
  2. Whether a substantial part of the events giving rise to the declaratory-judgment action occurred in Fayette County based on the underlying toxic-exposure litigation and Zurich's alleged duty to defend and indemnify.
  3. Whether International Refining established a clear legal right to transfer the action through a petition for a writ of mandamus.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (18)

  • Carr v. International Refining & Manufacturing Co., 13 So. 3d 947, 955 (Ala. 2009)(followed)
  • Ex parte Inverness Constr. Co., 775 So. 2d 153, 156 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
  • Ex parte Gates, 675 So. 2d 371, 374 (Ala. 1996)(followed)
  • Ex parte Pfizer, Inc., 746 So. 2d 960, 962 (Ala. 1999)(followed)
  • Ex parte Children's Hosp. of Alabama, 931 So. 2d 1, 5-6 (Ala. 2005)(followed)
  • Ex parte Finance America Corp., 507 So. 2d 458, 460 (Ala. 1987)(followed)
  • Ex parte Kane, 989 So. 2d 509, 511 (Ala. 2008)(followed)
  • Ex parte De Vega, 65 So. 3d 886, 891 (Ala. 2010)(followed)
  • Vulcan Materials Co. v. Alabama Insurance Guaranty Ass'n, 985 So. 2d 376, 381-82 (Ala. 2007)(applied)
  • DeKalb County LP Gas Co. v. Suburban Gas, Inc., 729 So. 2d 270, 275-76 (Ala. 1998)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…