Highlands of Lay, LLC v. Murphree

101 So. 3d 206 (Ala. 2012) · Supreme Court of Alabama · August 10, 2012

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court dismissed Highlands of Lay, LLC’s appeal from a default judgment because the judgment had been improperly certified as final under Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P. Claims against a remaining defendant involved issues closely intertwined with those on appeal, creating an unreasonable risk of inconsistent results from piecemeal review.

Holdings

  1. A Rule 54(b) certification is improper when the claims certified for appeal and the claims remaining in the trial court are so closely intertwined that separate adjudication poses an unreasonable risk of inconsistent results.
  2. Because the Rule 54(b) certification was improper, the appeal was dismissed as being from a nonfinal order.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court properly certified the default judgment and damages award against Highlands as final under Rule 54(b) while claims against Miller remained pending.
  2. Whether the appeal should be dismissed because the claims certified for appeal and the claims remaining below were so closely intertwined that separate adjudication created an unreasonable risk of inconsistent results.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Foster v. Greer & Sons, Inc., 446 So. 2d 605 (Ala. 1984)(followed)
  • Schlarb v. Lee, 955 So. 2d 418 (Ala. 2006)(followed)
  • Clarke-Mobile Counties Gas District v. Prior Energy Corp., 834 So. 2d 88 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • Branch v. SouthTrust Bank of Dothan, N.A., 514 So. 2d 1373 (Ala. 1987)(followed)
  • Centennial Assocs., Ltd. v. Guthrie, 20 So. 3d 1277 (Ala. 2009)(followed)
  • Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co., 9 So. 3d 1213 (Ala. 2008)(followed)
  • Lighting Fair, Inc. v. Rosenberg, 63 So. 3d 1256 (Ala. 2010)(followed)
  • Dzwonkowski v. Sonitrol of Mobile, Inc., 892 So. 2d 354 (Ala. 2004)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…