State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baggett

108 So. 3d 1008 (Ala. 2012) · Supreme Court of Alabama · September 21, 2012

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court held that State Farm was entitled to reimbursement of a $25,000 overpayment made to an insured after an automobile-accident judgment. The court rejected application of the common-fund doctrine to the overpaid amount and remanded with instructions to order reimbursement without deducting an attorney fee from that amount.

Holdings

  1. An insurer that inadvertently pays $25,000 in excess of its policy limits is entitled to reimbursement of the excess amount.
  2. Any attorney fee due with respect to the $85,000 collectively owed by Sagamore and State Farm must be taken from that $85,000, not from the $25,000 overpayment that State Farm is entitled to recover.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether State Farm was entitled to reimbursement of the $25,000 it inadvertently paid in excess of its UIM policy limit.
  2. Whether any attorney fee under the common-fund doctrine should be deducted from State Farm's $25,000 overpayment before reimbursement.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (3)

  • Lambert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 576 So. 2d 160 (Ala. 1991)(followed)
  • Lowe v. Nationwide Insurance Co., 521 So. 2d 1309 (Ala. 1988)(followed)
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Baggett, No. 2100221, 97 So. 3d 816 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011) (table)(reversed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…