D.C. Pruett Contracting Co. v. Jackson County Board of Education

164 So. 3d 532 (Ala. 2014) · Supreme Court of Alabama · September 26, 2014

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court granted the Jackson County Board of Education's petition for a writ of mandamus and directed dismissal of a contractor's claims for payment arising from high-school gymnasium renovations. The court held that county boards of education are entitled to sovereign immunity under Article I, § 14, of the Alabama Constitution and that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the original action against the Board. The court further held that the contractor's later amendment adding officials in their official capacities did not cure the jurisdictional defect.

Holdings

  1. A county board of education is a local agency of the State and is entitled to absolute sovereign immunity under § 14 of the Alabama Constitution.
  2. Because the original complaint was filed solely against the immune Board, the circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the action, and the complaint had to be dismissed.
  3. The subsequent amendment adding Board members and the superintendent in their official capacities did not cure the jurisdictional defect because the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain the amendment to the original complaint.
  4. The Board demonstrated a clear legal right to dismissal and was entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the Jackson Circuit Court to dismiss Pruett Contracting's complaint against the Board.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Jackson County Board of Education is entitled to absolute sovereign immunity under § 14 of the Alabama Constitution.
  2. Whether the circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the original complaint against the Board.
  3. Whether Pruett Contracting's amended complaint adding state officials in their official capacities could cure the jurisdictional defect in the original complaint.
  4. Whether the Board established the requirements for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing dismissal.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (23)

  • Ex parte Wood, 852 So. 2d 705, 708 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • Ex parte United Service Stations, Inc., 628 So. 2d 501, 503 (Ala. 1993)(followed)
  • Drummond Co. v. Alabama Department of Transportation, 937 So. 2d 56, 57-58 (Ala. 2006)(followed)
  • Ex parte Haralson, 853 So. 2d 928, 931 (Ala. 2003)(followed)
  • Newman v. Savas, 878 So. 2d 1147, 1148-49 (Ala. 2003)(followed)
  • Nance v. Matthews, 622 So. 2d 297, 299 (Ala. 1993)(followed)
  • Creola Land Development, Inc. v. Bentbrooke Housing, L.L.C., 828 So. 2d 285, 288 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • Pontius v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 915 So. 2d 557, 563 (Ala. 2005)(followed)
  • Ex parte Alabama Department of Transportation, 978 So. 2d 17, 20-21, 23 (Ala. 2007)(followed)
  • Ex parte Tuscaloosa County, 796 So. 2d 1100, 1103 (Ala. 2000)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 23.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…