Slamen v. Slamen

254 So. 3d 188 (Ala. 2017) · Supreme Court of Alabama · December 22, 2017 · No. 1160763

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court treated the defendants' appeal from an order requiring merit-based discovery as a petition for a writ of mandamus. Applying Ex parte Locklear Chrysler Jeep Dodge, LLC, the court held that a trial court exceeds its discretion by ordering general discovery while a motion to compel arbitration remains pending. The court granted the petition and directed the trial court to vacate its discovery order.

Holdings

  1. A challenge to a trial court's handling of discovery while a motion to compel arbitration remains pending is properly reviewed by petition for a writ of mandamus, not by an ordinary appeal from an order denying arbitration.
  2. A trial court exceeds its discretion by ordering a party to participate in merit-based discovery while that party's motion to compel arbitration is pending; discovery before the arbitration ruling must be limited to issues concerning whether the parties agreed to arbitrate or whether the claims are subject to arbitration.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the defendants' challenge to an order requiring merit-based discovery while a motion to compel arbitration was pending should be reviewed by appeal or by petition for a writ of mandamus.
  2. Whether the trial court exceeded its discretion by ordering the defendants to participate in general, merit-based discovery before resolving the pending motion to compel arbitration.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (15)

  • Slamen v. Slamen, 254 So. 3d 172, 173-74 (Ala. 2017)(followed for factual background)
  • Ex parte Locklear Chrysler Jeep Dodge, LLC, 251 So. 3d 40, 44-46 (Ala. 2017)(followed)
  • Ex parte Dangerfield, 49 So. 3d 675, 684 (Ala. 2010)(followed)
  • Ex parte Alfab, Inc., 586 So. 2d 889, 891 (Ala. 1991)(followed)
  • State v. Cobb, 288 Ala. 675, 678, 264 So. 2d 523, 526 (1972)(followed)
  • State v. Williams, 69 Ala. 311, 316 (1881)(followed)
  • Home Insurance Co. v. Rice, 585 So. 2d 859, 862 (Ala. 1991)(followed)
  • Ex parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB, 872 So. 2d 810, 813 (Ala. 2003)(followed)
  • Ex parte Kenworth of Birmingham, Inc., 789 So. 2d 227 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
  • Ex parte Jim Burke Automotive, Inc., 776 So. 2d 118 (Ala. 2000)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…