Tarik Yahia Farrag, M.D. v. Cynthia Diane Dennis Thomas

Tarik Yahia Farrag, M.D. v. Cynthia Diane Dennis Thomas · Supreme Court of Alabama · February 17, 2023 · No. 1200541 and 1200542

Summary

The Supreme Court of Alabama reviewed two consolidated appeals arising from medical-malpractice actions against Tarik Yahia Farrag, M.D. The Court affirmed the denial of Farrag’s Rule 60(b)(1) motion to set aside a default judgment, holding that he failed to establish excusable neglect and had forfeited his service-of-process and personal-jurisdiction arguments by not raising them in the motion. The Court dismissed the second appeal because the underlying judgment dismissing the duplicate action was wholly favorable to Farrag and he presented no argument challenging it.

Holdings

  1. Farrag forfeited his challenge to service of process and personal jurisdiction because he did not assert it in his Rule 60(b) motion; he also could not raise the issue for the first time on appeal.
  2. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Farrag's Rule 60(b)(1) motion because he failed to establish that his failure to defend resulted from mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect that ordinary prudence could not have prevented.
  3. The trial court was not required to weigh the Kirtland factors after finding that Farrag had failed to establish excusable neglect under Rule 60(b)(1).
  4. The appeal from dismissal of the duplicate action was dismissed because the judgment was wholly favorable to Farrag and he presented no argument challenging that judgment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Farrag forfeited his challenge to service of process and personal jurisdiction by failing to raise it in his Rule 60(b) motion.
  2. Whether Farrag established mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect warranting relief from the default judgment under Rule 60(b)(1).
  3. Whether the trial court was required to expressly address the Kirtland factors after finding that Farrag failed to establish excusable neglect.
  4. Whether Farrag could appeal the dismissal of the duplicate action when that judgment was wholly favorable to him and he presented no appellate argument directed to it.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (26)

  • Boudreaux v. Kemp, 49 So. 3d 1190, 1194 (Ala. 2010)(followed)
  • Nichols v. Pate, 992 So. 2d 734, 736 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008)(followed)
  • J.T. v. A.C., 892 So. 2d 928, 931 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004)(followed)
  • C.J.L. v. M.W.B., 868 So. 2d 451, 453 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003)(followed)
  • Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Ayers, 885 So. 2d 45 (Ala. 2003)(followed)
  • Hall v. Hall, 122 So. 3d 185, 190 (Ala. Civ. App. 2013)(followed)
  • Klaeser v. Milton, 47 So. 3d 817, 820 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010)(followed)
  • Campbell v. Taylor, 159 So. 3d 4, 11, 13 (Ala. 2014)(followed)
  • Pruitt v. Palm, 671 So. 2d 105 (Ala. Civ. App. 1995)(followed)
  • Swaim v. Moltan Co., 73 F.3d 711, 718 (7th Cir. 1996)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…