Summary
The Alaska Supreme Court held that the appeal was technically moot but warranted review under the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine. The court ruled that AS 23.40.210 gives the Alaska Labor Relations Agency jurisdiction to determine whether a labor dispute is arbitrable under a collective bargaining agreement. The court reversed the superior court's contrary ruling and affirmed the agency's determination that it had authority to decide arbitrability.
Holdings
- The appeal was moot because the union had already obtained the relief it sought and the court could not provide any further effective relief concerning the intermediate jurisdictional question.
- The public interest exception applied, allowing the court to decide the moot jurisdictional issue.
- AS 23.40.210 reserves to the Alaska Labor Relations Agency the power to determine whether a dispute is arbitrable under a collective bargaining agreement.
Questions Presented
- Whether the appeal was moot because the union had already obtained the ultimate relief it sought below.
- Whether the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine permitted review of the otherwise moot jurisdictional issue.
- Whether AS 23.40.210 gives the Alaska Labor Relations Agency authority to determine whether a dispute is arbitrable under a collective bargaining agreement.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (22)
- City of Fairbanks v. Rice, 20 P.3d 1097 (Alaska 2000)(cited)
- Kleven v. Yukon-Koyukuk School Dist., 853 P.2d 518, 525 n.13 (Alaska 1993)(cited)
- Bowers Office Prod., Inc. v. Univ. of Alaska, 755 P.2d 1095, 1096 (Alaska 1988)(cited)
- N. Alaska Envtl. Ctr. v. State, Dep't of Natural Res., 2 P.3d 629, 633 (Alaska 2000)(cited)
- Gerstein v. Axtell, 960 P.2d 599, 601 (Alaska 1998)(cited)
- O'Callaghan v. State, 920 P.2d 1387, 1388-89 (Alaska 1996)(cited)
- Trustees for Alaska v. State, 736 P.2d 324, 327 (Alaska 1987)(cited)
- Moore v. State, 553 P.2d 8, 24 n.25 (Alaska 1976)(cited)
- R.I. v. C.C., 9 P.3d 274, 278 (Alaska 2000)(cited)
- Alaska Consumer Advocacy Program v. Alaska Pub. Util. Comm'n, 793 P.2d 1028, 1032 n.1 (Alaska 1990)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…