Summary
The Alaska Supreme Court held that health insurance benefits provided to public employee retirees are accrued retirement benefits protected from diminishment or impairment under article XII, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution. The court further held that constitutional protection extends to the benefits themselves, rather than merely the premiums paid by the state. However, when evaluating changes to health insurance coverage, the balance between disadvantages and offsetting advantages generally must be assessed from the perspective of the retiree group rather than individual retirees. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the case.
Holdings
- Health insurance benefits that form part of the retirement benefit package are accrued benefits protected by article XII, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution.
- Article XII, section 7 protects the health insurance benefits and coverage provided, not merely the dollar amount of premiums paid by the State.
- The balance between disadvantages and offsetting advantages from changes to retiree health insurance must generally be evaluated from the perspective of the affected group rather than on an individual-by-individual basis.
Questions Presented
- Whether health insurance benefits provided through Alaska's public employee retirement systems are accrued benefits protected from diminishment or impairment by article XII, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution.
- Whether the constitutional protection extends only to the premiums paid by the State or instead protects the health insurance coverage and benefits themselves.
- Whether the comparative analysis of disadvantages and offsetting advantages resulting from changes to retiree health insurance must be conducted individually or from the perspective of the affected retiree group.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (26)
- Hammond v. Hoffbeck, 627 P.2d 1052 (Alaska 1981)(followed and distinguished)
- Sheffield v. Alaska Pub. Emps. Ass'n, Inc., 732 P.2d 1083 (Alaska 1987)(followed)
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Gentile, 922 P.2d 248 (Alaska 1996)(followed in part)
- Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd., 48 P.3d 432, 447 (Alaska 2002)(followed)
- Hickel v. Cowper, 874 P.2d 922, 926 (Alaska 1994)(followed)
- Arco Alaska, Inc. v. State, 824 P.2d 708, 710 (Alaska 1992)(followed)
- State ex rel. Hammond v. Allen, 625 P.2d 844 (Alaska 1981)(followed)
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Gallion, 944 P.2d 436 (Alaska 1997)(followed)
- Flisock v. State, 818 P.2d 640 (Alaska 1991)(followed)
- Betts v. Bd. of Admin. of the Pub. Emps.' Ret. Sys., 21 Cal. 3d 859, 582 P.2d 614 (1978)(followed in part)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.