Summary
The Alaska Supreme Court held that the Department of Health and Social Services provided defective due process notice concerning its Medicaid overpayment recoupment decision because the notice did not timely state the recoupment amount, explain the statistical methodology, or adequately inform the provider of her right to administrative review. The court remanded for DHSS to provide Keirsten Smart 30 days to request administrative review. The court also affirmed that DHSS's audit protocol was not a regulation requiring promulgation under the Alaska Administrative Procedure Act.
Holdings
- Smart's failure to appeal did not bar her claims because DHSS failed to provide adequate notice before the administrative appeal period expired. The notice therefore did not commence the period for seeking administrative review, and Smart must be given a new opportunity to request review.
- DHSS's notice violated due process because it did not timely and clearly state the amount DHSS intended to recoup, identify that the amount was based on statistical extrapolation, explain the methodology sufficiently to permit a challenge, or provide that information before the administrative appeal period expired.
- DHSS's audit protocol was not a regulation requiring promulgation under the APA. The properly promulgated regulation authorizing statistically valid sampling methodologies was sufficient.
Questions Presented
- Whether Smart's due process claims were barred by her failure to exhaust administrative remedies when DHSS's notice did not adequately identify the recoupment decision, the amount sought, or the basis for the calculation before the appeal period expired.
- Whether due process required DHSS's notice of Medicaid recoupment to include the factual and legal basis for the recoupment, the amount sought, the relevant methodology, and notice of the right to administrative review.
- Whether DHSS's audit protocol constituted a regulation that had to be promulgated under the Alaska Administrative Procedure Act.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (19)
- Hidden Heights Assisted Living, Inc. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, 222 P.3d 258, 261 (Alaska 2009)(followed)
- Garner v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Medical Assistance, 63 P.3d 264, 268 (Alaska 2003)(followed)
- State, Department of Revenue v. Andrade, 23 P.3d 58, 65 (Alaska 2001)(followed)
- Hymes v. DeRamus, 222 P.3d 874, 883 (Alaska 2010)(followed)
- Pepper v. Routh Crabtree, APC, 219 P.3d 1017, 1020 (Alaska 2009)(followed)
- Heitz v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, 215 P.3d 302, 305, 307-308 (Alaska 2009)(followed)
- Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. v. Chugach Electric Association, Inc., 99 P.3d 553, 560 (Alaska 2004)(followed)
- Mount Juneau Enterprises v. City & Borough of Juneau, 923 P.2d 768, 776-777 (Alaska 1996)(followed)
- Ben Lomond, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage, 761 P.2d 119, 122 (Alaska 1988)(followed)
- State, Department of Labor, Wage & Hour Division v. University of Alaska, 664 P.2d 575, 581 (Alaska 1983)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.