Summary
The Alaska Supreme Court affirmed the superior court’s decision upholding the Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles’ refusal to title and register a customized vehicle as a low-speed vehicle. The court held that substantial evidence supported the finding that the vehicle’s compliance with applicable federal safety standards had not been demonstrated and that the Department’s decision had a reasonable basis. The court also explained that a vehicle need not have a manufacturer’s certificate of origin or known manufacturer, but must satisfy the applicable safety standards.
Holdings
- Substantial evidence supported the agency's finding that the vehicle had not been shown to comply with the applicable safety standards.
- The DMV had a reasonable basis under AS 28.10.041 and AS 28.10.221 to refuse to title and register the vehicle as a low-speed vehicle.
- The reasonable-basis standard, rather than the substitution-of-judgment standard, governed review because the determination implicated agency expertise and the Department's delegated regulatory authority over vehicle titling and registration.
- The absence of a manufacturer's certificate of origin, a known manufacturer, or manufacture for highway use did not independently bar title and registration; actual compliance with applicable safety standards was the legal requirement. The absence of a 17-character VIN likewise was not independently dispositive because Alaska law permits replacement of missing or altered VINs.
Questions Presented
- Whether substantial evidence supported the agency's finding that the vehicle had not been shown to comply with applicable low-speed-vehicle safety standards.
- Whether the DMV had a reasonable basis under Alaska law to refuse to title and register, and to revoke the title and registration of, the vehicle as a low-speed vehicle.
- Whether the substitution-of-judgment standard, rather than the reasonable-basis standard, governed review of the agency's determination.
- Whether the absence of a manufacturer’s certificate of origin, known manufacturer, or 17-character VIN independently barred title and registration.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- Conkey v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 113 P.3d 1235, 1237 (Alaska 2005)(followed)
- McKitrick v. State, Public Employees' Retirement System, 284 P.3d 832, 837 (Alaska 2012)(followed)
- Rhines v. State, 30 P.3d 621, 624 (Alaska 2001)(followed)
- Lindhag v. State, Department of Natural Resources, 123 P.3d 948, 952 (Alaska 2005)(followed)
- Titus v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 305 P.3d 1271, 1276 (Alaska 2013)(followed)
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of Administration, 324 P.3d 293, 299 (Alaska 2014)(followed)
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co., 746 P.2d 896, 903 (Alaska 1987)(followed)
- Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural Resources, 254 P.3d 1078, 1082 (Alaska 2011)(followed)
- Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities Commission, 836 P.2d 343, 348 (Alaska 1992)(followed)
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. Hammond, 726 P.2d 166, 175-176 (Alaska 1986)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.