Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed an order adjudicating Luis Parada a level two sexually violent offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court held that Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying a downward departure because the mitigating considerations were largely accounted for in the risk assessment and were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying conduct.
Holdings
- Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying a downward departure because most of defendant's claimed mitigating circumstances were accounted for in the Board's risk assessment instrument, and any unaccounted-for considerations were plainly outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying criminal conduct.
Questions Presented
- Whether Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant defendant a downward departure from the presumptive sex-offender risk level.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- People v. Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 (2014)(followed)
- People v. Saxton, 231 AD3d 557 (1st Dept 2024), lv denied 42 NY3d 913 (2025)(applied)
- People v. Simmons, 123 AD3d 617 (1st Dept 2014), lv denied 25 NY3d 985 (2015)(applied)
- People v. Cabrera, 91 AD3d 655 (1st Dept 2021)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…